Here is the d'var Torah that I gave this past Shabbat on my experience:
Taking the Food Stamp Challenge
Shabbat Chayei Sarah
November 19, 2011
Ohr Kodesh Congregation
As many of you are aware, for the past week, I have participated
in the Food Stamp Challenge. During this time, I ate on a budget of $31.50 for
the week, the average amount that an adult on food stamps receives. The Food
Stamp Challenge is a national initiative publicized by the Food Research and
Action Center in 2007. Over the past
four years, Members of Congress, governors, state officials, journalists and
other community leaders have taken the Challenge to experience firsthand what
it takes to make ends meet on the average food stamp benefit. This year, the Jewish Council for Public
Affairs partnered with an organization called Faith in Action to encourage
leaders in the Jewish community to take this Challenge.
A quick look at the statistics regarding Food Stamps,
or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program – SNAP – as it is formally
known. I am not, nor will I pretend to
be, a policy expert – many people here could speak much more eloquently and
knowledgably about the policy issues than I can or will. However, some basic information in
understanding the situation of hunger in America will help set the context:
- In 2010, more than 40 million people received an average of $133.79 per month. This is the largest number on this program in our country’s history - nearly double the number of people who received this benefit in 2002, and 7 million more than received it in 2009 – the biggest one year jump in the program’s history.
- The Federal government spent $68 billion dollars on SNAP in 2010, roughly 2% of the Federal budget. Again compare this to 2002, when the total cost of the program was $20 billion.
- To be eligible for SNAP in FY 2011-12 a family of 4 must earn a total gross income of less than $29,000 a year.
These statistics paint a frightening picture, as the
needs and subsequent costs of the program skyrocket.
I'm still not sure why I responded to this call to
action, among the dozens of emails I receive asking me to participate in
actions for worthy causes. Issues of poverty and hunger in America are
important to me, but so are many other issues and I haven't acted upon many
of the others. Part of what drew me to this action, ironically, is also one of
its limitations – it felt “doable.” It
wasn’t asking me to do this for a month or for a year. I didn’t have to attend
evening meetings or out-of-town conventions.
While I knew it wouldn’t be easy, I thought I could do this without
disrupting my every-day life.
But, as I mentioned, this “do-ability” is also one of
its limitations. One member of the
congregation, who agreed to have me share her comments, offered the follow
critique:
This is a stunt…If you
were really trying to do it, you would have to make the commitment that you
and your family would simply accept poverty level income plus food stamps
and other government benefits for a prolonged period of time – without
the assurance that Ohr Kodesh would be waiting for you when you are finished.
Then, you would take the income and the food stamp allowance for your
family – not the single allocation for you – and figure out what to buy in bulk
and how to combine assets. That what real people in poverty do.
Then, you would have to give up your car and figure out how to find a grocery
store on the bus line and schlep everything home. And you couldn’t use
the Supergiant on E-W Highway because that’s too close to your house… And at the end – no, there would be no “end” because
people live that way for months and years and entire lifetimes, so there is no
relief at the end to say, “Well, I did that and now I know how it feels.”
You won’t. And
even for those for whom poverty ends, they don’t know when it will end, there
is no calendar for it.
The writer is, of course, correct. This is a stunt
whose point is to raise awareness. My participation in the Challenge does
nothing to change the face of food insecurity in America. I was constantly
aware of this deficiency while I was taking the Challenge. During this week, I still
slept in a comfortable bed in a warm home, drove in my car, carefully planned
my meals with consideration to nutrition and health, had use of the internet,
friends (including a nutritionist), and cookbooks to aide me in planning my
meals, shopped around for the best deals, filled up my gas tank, etc. I
was not living a life of poverty and I was not experiencing the life of a
person who lives on food stamps. But even with these limitations, taking
this Challenge provided me with some important insights that I would not have understood
without it.
I became keenly aware of how casual I usually am about
what I eat and how much it costs. I grew up in a home that was middle class –
by my teens, we were more comfortable, but for most of my childhood, my parents
were extremely careful about every dollar spent. We never lacked for anything significant but
there were times when money was tight. My parents instilled within me the need
to be careful with money, and I took that message to heart when it comes to
what I thought of as the “big ticket items.” Yet with food, I generally did not
make that connection. Typically, I look
at prices at the grocery store and try to buy things on sale, but I don’t
usually make menu decisions based on the cost of the meal.
In contrast, this week, I needed to plan out every
meal: what I would eat, where I would eat it, making sure I always had a water
bottle with me so that I wouldn’t have to purchase a beverage. I couldn’t snack and I had to eat the same
things over and over again. At one
point, I developed headaches and grew irritable. I didn’t eat any meat, cheese, or yogurt for
the entire week. I had one banana a day,
but no other fruit. My vegetables for
the entire week consisted of one package of carrots, 4 potatoes and an onion –
most of which went into a lentil soup that sustained me throughout the
week. [As a side note, I also began to
understand why Esav was willing to sell his birthright for a bowl of lentils!] My daily menu was a bowl of cheerios or
scrambled eggs and a banana for breakfast, a peanut butter and jelly sandwich
and sometimes a bowl of lentil soup for lunch, another bowl of the lentil soup
and kasha varnishkes (bowtie pasta with buckwheat) or rice and beans for
dinner.
My meals were boring and bland and sometimes when I
would see other food, it was hard to remember not to eat it. And yet, I cannot say that I truly suffered –
I had enough food to sustain myself. But, I only did this for one week – I
chose the beginning point and the end point.
As the writer of the e-mail that I referred to earlier noted, if I were
truly living off of SNAP “there would be no ‘end’ because people live that way
for months and years and entire lifetimes, so there is no relief at the end.”
Oh, and did I mention water? I never drank as much water as I did this
week. Since there was no money for
beverages, water was the only thing I drank all week, with the exception of one
cup of tea each day. Whenever I was
thirsty, I drank water; whenever I was hungry, I drank water; if I was around
other people eating, I drank water. No juice, no coffee, no soda, no wine – not
necessarily unhealthy, but definitely unusual for me. I probably drank 12-15
glasses of water a day.
As I identified with Esav regarding the lentils, I
also gained new insight about the role of water in this week’s Torah portion, Chayei
Sarah.
As we read this morning, shortly after Sarah’s death,
Avraham sent his servant Eliezer to go back to his ancestral homeland in Nachor
and find a wife for Yitzchak. After a brief conversation, Eliezer departs on
his mission and arrives just outside of the city, near the wells where women
would come each morning to draw water for the day. With no instruction from
Avraham on how to pick Yitzchak’s wife, Eliezer devises a test: When the women
came to draw water from the well, he would ask for a bit of water for
himself. The woman who offered water for
him and also for his camel would be the right match for Yitzchak. No sooner does he devise the test than Rivkah
appears and does exactly as he described.
Why this test?
What was it about drawing water for him and also for his camel that was
so compelling? First, of course, we know
that water is the essence of life. Our
tradition makes numerous references to mayim chayim – living water or
the water of life. We know from science
that our bodies are made mostly of water, our earth is made mostly of water and
without water there can be no life. When
the rabbis want to emphasize the importance of Torah, they use the metaphor of
water. Water is a basic element
necessary for life.
The medieval commentator Rashi writes about Eliezer’s test and notes that the act of sharing her water with Eliezer and his camel proves that Rivkah is worthy of Yitzchak and worthy of entering Avraham’s house because it demonstrates her value of g’milut chasadim – acts of loving kindness.
The commentator Kli Yakar takes this notion of g’milut
chasadim and notes 3 aspects of this test:
- First, he points out that this story is juxtaposed with the story at s’deh Ephron, in which Avraham negotiates the purchase of Sarah’s burial place. He posits that Avraham demanded that Yitzchak’s wife not come from Canaan because his experience with the Canaanites in those negotiations showed him that they value money above all else. In the case of Eliezer’s test for Yitzchak’s wife, we see that an ayin tovah u’g’milut chasadim – a good eye and acting kindly – were most important. Giving water to his camel, even though he only asks for water for himself, is proof of her strong sense of g’milut chasadim.
- He also notes that there is a hint of this idea within the wording itself. The word gamal (camel), and especially in the form of g’malecha (your camel) – is close in form to the word g’milut chasadim.
- Finally, he notes that g’milut chasadim – acts of loving kindness – is a binyan av – a paradigm– for all values. He writes that if you find someone who is strong in this value, you don’t need to check further about that person’s character.
Rivkah, we are taught,
is the right match for Yitzchak because she excels in doing acts of
lovingkindness – proven by the way she looks out not only for Eliezer’s needs,
but also for the needs of his camel.
Prior to taking the
challenge, I probably could have drawn the parallel between Rivkah’s exemplary
spirit of g’milut chasadim as qualification to be Yitzchak’s wife and
our own need to reach beyond ourselves to help the hungry in our own
community. But there is one additional
insight from this story that I only learned from my experience this week.
As the story is told,
Rivkah shows up immediately after Eliezer finished devising his test. But it also states that he was there at the eit
tzet hashoavot – the time when women came to draw water. I presume there were many women who were
there. I wonder how they reacted when they saw this man come riding across the
desert. I imagine that most would have
simply turned aside – averted their eyes, ignored his request, too busy with
their own needs and the needs of their family to stop and help a stranger.
Rivkah, on the other hand, reached beyond herself and not only took care of his
request – to give him a bit of water – but exceeded it by giving him as much as
he needed and then looking after his camel as well.
The Torah gives no
indication that Rivkah knew who Eliezer was or why he was there. She acted assuming that he was a total
stranger, an “other.” But, in the course
of reaching beyond herself and treating him kindly, she discovered he was not a
stranger at all, but an important part of her family.
In the end, the most
meaningful part of taking the Food Stamp Challenge for me came from unexpected
places. I received e-mails and Facebook
messages, comments on my blog, people stopping me in stores and on the
streets. Our internet world allowed me
to share my experience with hundreds of other people and, in turn, dozens of
people shared their experiences with me. I am especially grateful to those
individuals who shared with me their personal experience of life on food
stamps. In taking the Food Stamp Challenge, I thought I was learning more about
the anonymous “other,” the stranger, but
just like Rivkah, as I tried to reach beyond myself, I discovered that food stamp
recipients are not strangers – they are here within our own community. They are our friends, congregants and members
of our family. They are, too often, hidden and embarrassed, but they are
here.
Consider the following
e-mail from a member of the congregation, again shared with permission:
I just read about your
food stamp challenge. Bravo for accepting what will be a lesson in what
is necessary vs. not, and learning to live without the simple pleasures that we
are so used to.
I lived on public
assistance with my child when times were excruciatingly tough after my divorce.
There are a few things
that I learned along the way, too. Members of the Jewish community are
completely unaware that there are people within their OWN community who are in
need. We often think of "other" groups as participants in such
programs, but not our own. I can't tell you how many times I went out of
my way to shop in a store where people that I might know would not see me pay
for groceries. I always looked around the doctor and dentist's office
before taking out my Medicare card at my child’s appointments. And I
personally was without any and all medical insurance for years. While you
are blogging about this experience, some people are going out of the way to not
be humiliated. Sadly, it is still not something that we feel comfortable
talking about so as not to be judged.
I hope that if you can
share one thing about this experience with readers it is that this is life for
people right in THEIR OWN community, in THEIR OWN neighborhood. Many
thanks for raising awareness.
And, so too, this one:
I saw you were doing the food stamp challenge. I thought I would
send you a message on that. Maybe it can help(?) My husband and I are raising 3
kids on $30,000. He works very hard 6 days a week doing construction. I work 3
part time jobs, subbing at the schools, cutting hair and babysitting. Our
mortgage is $1600.00 a month. Yes, we are on food stamps. Now here is the
catch. Because our oldest son is living under our roof and working at Chipotle,
they are taking away our medical, AND our $32.00/per person food stamps is
becoming $25.00/per person a week…We work so hard, raise our kids right and
can’t get ahead. I don’t see how barely giving us food will help :( I don’t
know if this will help your project, you are welcome to use my
"story", please just don’t use our real names. Good luck :)
It is important to note that for the congregant who critiqued this
program (calling it a “stunt”) also noted that this was a personal issue:
As a child, we had experience with
this sort of thing…and you can’t get there from where you are.
My family ended up some
distance from where it started (and my children ended up a very long way from
where my parents and grandparents were), but the process was long and
incremental.
There is a serious conversation to
be had about food insecurity in the United States.
In the end, I feel
that taking on this Challenge was a small, but important, attempt to understand
this issue better. I am keenly aware
that my participation did not feed anyone who was hungry, nor did it change
policy for programs that impact the hungry. But I did come away knowing that
the 40 million Americans that I mentioned at the beginning are not some
faceless mass. They are people right here in our community – they are our
friends and they are our family. And,
too often, we simply avert our eyes.
My hope is that participating
in this Challenge has helped permanently opened my eyes in a way that will lead
me to better answer when I hear a stranger’s call for help. I hope that this experience
will help me, and all of us, to emulate the spirit of Rivkah, reaching beyond
ourselves, through acts of loving kindness.
In doing so, may we become worthy, like Rivkah, to be called ba’alei
g’milut chasadim – masters of loving kindness. I believe that there can be no greater title.

